Are news reports always meant to look like this?
Do you love reading the newspaper this way?
More importantly, have you ever even thought that you deserve to read news stories written in various ways?
So when was the last time you
read something really gripping or engaging in a newspaper in Assam?
Something or someone you
connected with or felt strongly about? I am not talking about a report on price
hike of petrol or the cabinet reshuffle. Yes, both those reports can arouse
different emotions in you but I am talking about something more intimate here. Stories,
not mere reports which go beyond your immediate and direct concern but engage
you and move you.
What
is the inverted pyramid structure?
Simply put, this is a news writing format where the most important facts of a report are written in the beginning.
I was, till a couple of days ago,
under the impression that the inverted pyramid was a product of the civil war
of America (1861-1865) when editors were increasingly getting frustrated with
the unreliable but expensive means of telegraph used by reporters to transmit stories from the field. Make no mistake, back in the day, the telegraph was as revolutionary as the internet is today, but those were the early years and more often than not stories would get cut
off mid-sentence due to failure of transmission. So as a solution, frustrated
editors urged writers to fill in the most important facts first, followed by
the lengthier details. Soon reporters developed a formula for compressing
stories and summarizing the most important facts first. Over time this took a
more refined shape with the Who, What, When, Where, Why and How being included
in the summary and the formula came to be known as the Inverted pyramid. Thus,
goes the story.
However, it seems this is no more
than folklore.
Journalism historian David T.Z.
Mindich, argued that the inverted pyramid was born at the time of Abraham
Lincoln’s death but even this has been negated in findings by Marcus Errico.
Taking a look at Errico’s study here
compels us to come to the conclusion that the ‘inverted pyramid structure’ or
the ‘summary news lead’ did not become a norm till the first decade of the 20th
century although we cannot say that it was never used before that.
Today this is a formula
religiously followed across the world although other formulas like The Martini lead and the Wall street journal lead are also used in
the U.S. to structure the story. In India and here in Assam we rarely look beyond the
inverted pyramid style. Assamese newspapers follow something of their own which
can be at best described as similar to early 19th century style of
writing where the reporter starts a story by providing his own comments along
with a flurry of adjectives to describe the story and ends with an opinion. The
idea that a news report can also be explored in more detail in follow up
stories, or it can be presented more engagingly in a different structure doesn’t
seem to exist.
The Good
So why is it that the inverted pyramid
lead is so widely accepted across the world? Well, for starters it lets us
organize information effectively and quickly and is ideal for readers who want
to get to the facts straight. For
reporters, it is an efficient way to understand breaking news or to write
quick, short reports in case of breaking news. Further, it is also helpful from
the perspective of the desk people because when it comes to quick editing the
news reports can be easily trimmed from bottom up, the least important details are at the bottom in the inverted pyramid structure.
But is this the best or only way of
structuring a story? Should it be always used?
Depending on the nature of the
story or the news report the answer could be both yes and no. However, what is definitely ‘yes’ is that
there are more ways than one to write the newspaper story.
Leads like the narrative lead,
the anecdotal lead and the scene setter leads are just some of the few leads
that can be used to break the monotony of the inverted pyramid.
The Bad
Former journalist Bruce DaSilva, once
famously said. “The inverted pyramid remains the Dracula of journalism. It
keeps rising from its coffin and sneaking into paper.”
Senior journalists here may and
will argue that the job of the newspaper is to inform, it is not to connect on
an emotional level but that is no reason for not looking beyond the inverted
pyramid lead.
I believe that due to lack of
reading good journalistic work, the stories
come off as mere repetitions or shadows of one another, one more dull than the
next bereft of any voice and as appealing as the electronic voice of a railway
passenger enquiry system.
In an age of digital onslaught, when 24x7 news channels rule the roost
(7 channels in Guwahati and counting)
how can the print media do more ? Certainly not by giving dry, drab press
releases of information.
Looking beyond
Formulas are good but not at the
expense of the heart of a story and the people it is written for. Generations
of readers here have been accustomed to the substandard and the petty with
little in terms of choice being offered to them. “We know best. This is what
works and what you should read” seems to be an arrogant surmise. Thus, news
stories are not something to be savoured and relished but something to be
shoved down your throat like a pill that’s bitter but necessary. With little attention being paid to the
crafting of the story, the focus is more on cramming in more and more
‘facts’. This creates a barrier of aloofness between the story and the reader. Why should I care if there is a riot or 200 people died in a storm? It's just another bit of information for me on the paper. To connect with readers, I believe we need more than the inverted pyramid. The readers here are perhaps
content too because when you are a frog in the well you think the well is the
world.
The offshoot of this is seen in
the culture of apathy towards learning or writing good English. As long as you
can write in the order of
The most important facts first
Lesser important
fact
One more
One
more
Zzzz…
barely managing
to write grammatically correct English is considered good enough. The people on the
desk will take care of the rest.
While most journalists here
(including the new ones) would consider this sacrilege, they would be well informed
to take note of stories being written across the globe. So, while there is no doubting the utility and
the worthiness of the inverted pyramid, it is time we pushed ourselves out of a
mental rut and started thinking of journalistic writing as more than a mere
collections of facts wrapped together by a blanket of 'objectivity'.